Ronin in Crisis? The Network That Powered Web3 Faces Its Biggest Challenge

The Ronin network, known for fueling the early growth of Web3 games—especially Axie Infinity—is facing a period of stagnation marked by a decline in active users, the exit or inactivity of several games, and a general sense of uncertainty within the community.

This situation has reignited debate around shared responsibilities within the Web3 ecosystem. A comment posted by a content creator recognized within the network sparked mixed reactions by suggesting that users bear part of the responsibility for the current state of the ecosystem, without directly mentioning developers or projects.

The Responsibility Debate

The initial message suggested that users should be more critical of their investment and participation decisions, avoiding purchases of digital assets they do not find useful or interesting.

The reaction was immediate. Several content creators and users responded by arguing that much of the problem lies in broken promises by developers and unsustainable economic models promoted since the early stages of many projects.

Questioning Development Models

Cases were mentioned where games failed to progress in development or outright disappeared after raising expectations. Some projects were accused of raising funds without meeting basic milestones, such as playable versions or functional economies.

There was also criticism of large investment rounds, noting that in many cases, the funding has not translated into visible or sustainable improvements.

Furthermore, it was pointed out that some studios prioritize immediate revenue generation through NFT presales, VIP passes, or tokens, without offering a polished or complete gameplay experience. According to many participants in the debate, this has damaged user trust and led to an exodus of both players and content creators.

Users, Investors, and Developers: A Fragmented Ecosystem

The conflict has highlighted the complexity of the Web3 ecosystem, where users, developers, investors, and platforms all interact. Some argue that developers are not sufficiently prepared to launch quality products and that investors set unrealistic goals compared to the realities of game development.

On the other hand, it was also noted that users often prioritize economic expectations over enjoyment or gameplay quality.

A Community in Transformation

Several ecosystem participants have stated that the current situation has discouraged content creation and active participation.

The ongoing drop in game quality, the lack of transparency, and the widespread lack of motivation have driven many players away from the network, reducing creators' reach and the visibility of projects.

Despite its complexity, this situation invites a broader reflection on the roles, expectations, and responsibilities within the Web3 ecosystem. Opinions differ—often drastically—but they all converge on one key point: something needs to change. The direction of that change, however, remains open to interpretation.